I will start speaking from this quote by Manuel Castell: “The different group collectives divided by media symbols. Every nation meets divided into political, economic, religious and social spaces that different interpolate the subjects of the facts. The technical and technological division of the job. The new societies are structured bipolarly between the self and the network ... "
what the author wants to highlight regarding the concise topic of technology such as It has divided the world but in some other way it interconnects it in bipolarities of technological action and computing. You are a new man and woman in the system that it exists today, in the information and technology age. What the author tries to tell us is that the self, that is, the individual, is interwoven in the informational and technological network currently by the globality. Is To say that network societies are interconnected worldwide. The technology is media or central, which leads us to think that there are niches of innovation and technological expansion. Throughout history, technology is focused on production systems and world organizations and has evolved in different spheres, economic, political, cultural and social. As an example we have the United States, China, Japan, Europe that currently dominate the technology market. The problem with technology is that it is not properly applied to creativity organizational of geopolitics. In the late 80s new languages were created computer and computer networks. But to be concise from the end of the Second world war, technological developments would mark the historical future world social. But before taking this leap and explanation I will try to point out how is that in the late 80s and early 21st century this historical technological revolution that begins in the late nineteenth century and early XX, but which in turn, has an ancestor in previous centuries, from beginning of the XV century.
Well, with the colonial expansion technology also expanded and the mix between races and knowledge that over time until today have been revolutionizing in the world social future. So this is how already in an interconnected world
with all corners of the world it begins to expand towards homogeneous ends. Advances in technology and scientific discoveries promised change social very quickly, although we can speak of two revolutions: the industrial and digital. Revolutions are the historical result of knowledge collective applied to technologies and innovation, the problem is that it was very privatized technology, knowledge is protected in few people and privatize that technology, and so on in every nation or country. That is why evolution industrial, computer and communication has been somehow becoming fragmented and even modern today. But to point out regarding the reading he mentions three stages fields interrelated technologies that bring together electronic technological history: the microelectronics, computers and telecommunications. What you want to explain Regarding this point, Castell is that if technology can modify the human genome that you can no longer do with technology? It is when you enter debates the practical and evaluative purposes of technology, that is, it is going technology on track? While just like computers and the internet are a state and military product, by privatizing this technology that we can expect from informational networks? The world is woven in some way incredible, although before it was only by land and sea and limited to little technology now we can communicate with someone who is on the other side of the world in moments. Modern satellites and large computer storages Centrals encode the information day by day. No historical process is isolated. interconnects with all the social movements of the time and technological advance and the techniques and tools necessary to be able to interweave evolution historical because while it is known that history has been the mixture of races.
Now if we understand the technological revolutions they tend to mix in all the social and scientific fields, it is impossible that the dependencies between institutions, companies or agents can break without causing chaos that is why As social scientists we must observe the possible solutions or electives to the phenomena involved in the information age Today we can say that from the 80s on, technology served to global restructuring. There are distinctions, between capitalism, statism, industrialism and informationalism So what we will talk about is that before what was mass produced was products that used other types of energy such as hydro or steam or coal, or even the worker's hand of force, but for example with the discovery of electricity and further ahead the digital chip, all forms, ways of material, mercantile and social reproduction evolved since interconnected social relations systems change others dynamic. The labor force required by the production of societies technologies is very different from the work that agrarian societies require or industrial, but since we recognize that history is not linear, that is why that today is surrounded by more evolved societies than others in technological matters.
What the State always seeks is the hegemony of the population through imaginary schemes. Organized societies. A new social identity from technologies and cultural attributes. An example is nationalism creating solidarity
It seems that ideology was mechanized in the creation of identities, forms of struggle are different from the past, in a matter of social movements.
